본문바로가기

팝업레이어 알림


Free Board

제목 :

If we Wanted our text to Be Unreadably Tiny

2023.12.29

If we needed our text to be unreadably tiny, X-fetish.tube we would have informed our browser to show it that method. This one mugs viewers with 20" and 21" screens significantly hard; since most fonts are scaled for 72dpi they're already 30% smaller than they ought to be at 100dpi. Anybody who use these tags for operating textual content needs to be compressed by 30% themselves, slowly, and ideally in a machine with large nasty spikes.

masturbation with Javascript There may be a big class of Javascript annoyances perpetrated by people whose capacity to do cutting and pasting exceeds their negligible sense of style. Of those, considered one of the commonest is the script that scrolls textual content in the Netscape standing line. To all the disadvantages of this one adds the actual fact that you cannot see where links go any extra. Better than that, pages with 25K of Javascript followed by
pointless use of Java There is one factor worse than your average backyard-variety idiot net designer, and that's the half-intelligent idiot who loves to ring in all the most recent know-how with out stopping to consider its facet-effects. One notorious Fortune a hundred website, when it detects a Netscape browser, assumes it's essential to be able to assist a fancy Java search applet - and if in case you have Java turned off for security causes, you can't search the location, as a result of the perfectly enough CGI search you'd get in the event you were using Lynx has been disabled. Moral: Keep It Simple, Stupid!

pop-up home windows Some notably irritating designers have found the magic method that causes your browser to spawn a new window if you click on a link - or worse, methods to make pop-up windows appear even if all you are making an attempt to do is exit their wretched hive of scum and villainy as quickly as you will discover the Back button. Stay in your own window, dammit! The net is supposed to be about viewer control; designers who persist in rudely grabbing items of the viewer's screenspace without permission need to be lashed with knouts.

menus made completely from picture maps Clue: lots of people use textual content-only browsers like lynx, both as a result of they wish to (for velocity) or as a result of they have to (visible impairment, or lack of a graphics show). A whole page that shows up only as "[ISMAP]-[Image]" is useless. Designers who cannot be bothered to at the very least present a hyperlink to an alternate textual content menu are, at the very least, responsible of laziness and thoughtlessness. Huge picture-maps are bad even for graphical browsers; they're slow-loading and needlessly frustrate customers. And a pissed off consumer is a gone user.

sound and video that launches with out prompting About those embedded movies that just immediately begin enjoying by default, without bothering to ask you if you'd like them to be performed? No. If you have advertisements in your site, nice, but when my loudspeakers suddenly start yelling about how I can win a ONE THOUSAND Dollar Gift CARD if I simply TAKE THIS SURVEY NOW you possibly can take it to the financial institution that I would sooner lick sores at a leper colony than reply your survey or ever do any enterprise with you. And here's a hint to everyone who runs porn sites: most people who watch porn do not want the sounds of people having sex broadcast to everybody inside a thirty-foot radius.

CSS that sets fastened-measurement fonts dimensioned in pixels That is the idiot net designer's favourite technique to make a site unreadable on a monitor with a finer dot pitch than the one he/she occurred to use. Guess what occurs once you set a ten or 11px font on a 72dpi monitor and it gets seen on a 120dpi monitor? That's proper, on the spot eyestrain and one other user cursing your name. This drawback is going to get worse as shows get bigger and finer-grained.

CSS that modifications the hotlink colours Isn't it enjoyable if you surf to a page and your eyes stall out trying to figure out which piece of text are hotlinks? That underlined blue and purple are helpful navigational cues in the online jungle. If the page has multi-colored links or hyperlinks that aren't simply distinguishable, then this is another case where overriding the browser's settings ought to be punishable by intimate acquaintance with a flensing knife.

Forcing one in all background and text color, but not both. Suppose I like my pages to default to inexperienced text on a black background? (Yes, I truly obtained e mail from a reader who does this!) When you set your text color to black, but don't set the background color, the location will be unreadable. For those who set your background color to white (or worse nonetheless, orange - this has occurred too!) however don't set the text color, I will develop eyestrain and wish a plague of creeping horrors on you. It's not sensible to assume that the viewer has not fiddled with the default settings on their browser; both set both colours or neither.

background MIDI, Flash, Shockwave, and other abominations Background music takes eternally to load, and isn't portable. Flash and Shockwave take endlessly to load, aren't portable, and are proprietary formats that lock you into a single vendor. Whenever you insult your viewers with crap like this, do not anticipate them again.

메뉴 및 하단 정보 건너뛰고 페이지 맨 위로 이동